Elite consultations score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Elite consultations score was 0.201 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
0.201
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
115th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.51
in 2022
All-time low
-2.18
in 1936
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite consultations score in Kazakhstan, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.201 for elite consultations score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 125.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.51 in 2022 and was at its lowest, -2.18, in 1936.
Kazakhstan ranks 115th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Elite consultations score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.1 | — |
| 1790 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -11.1% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.8 | -3.3% |
| 1859 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.06 | -41.2% |
| 1907 | -1.04 | -2.0% |
| 1908 | -1.1 | +5.9% |
| 1909 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.695 | -36.9% |
| 1918 | -0.635 | -8.6% |
| 1919 | -0.808 | +27.2% |
| 1920 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.99 | +22.5% |
| 1923 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.26 | +27.3% |
| 1926 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.53 | +21.4% |
| 1930 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.02 | +31.8% |
| 1934 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.18 | +8.3% |
| 1937 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1947 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.448 | -74.9% |
| 1955 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.556 | +24.1% |
| 1966 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.211 | -62.1% |
| 1986 | -0.374 | +77.3% |
| 1987 | -0.243 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | -0.243 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.015 | -93.8% |
| 1990 | -0.414 | +2660.0% |
| 1991 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.759 | +83.3% |
| 1997 | -0.759 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.952 | +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.902 | -5.3% |
| 2011 | -0.902 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.902 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.804 | -10.9% |
| 2014 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.69 | -14.2% |
| 2017 | -1.02 | +48.4% |
| 2018 | -1.02 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.146 | -114.3% |
| 2020 | 0.153 | +4.8% |
| 2021 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.51 | +233.3% |
| 2023 | 0.201 | -60.6% |
| 2024 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.201 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478, 42% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.201 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 14% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.89 | -2.1 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.85 | -1.87 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.51 | -1.8 | -1.04 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.9845 | -1.1 | -0.635 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.12 | -1.53 | -0.808 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.94 | -2.18 | -1.53 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.18 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.982 | -1.78 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.502 | -0.556 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.556 | -0.556 | -0.556 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3866 | -0.556 | -0.015 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.5906 | -0.952 | -0.414 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.952 | -0.952 | -0.952 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.771 | -1.02 | 0.146 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2365 | 0.153 | 0.51 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Kazakhstan?
- Elite consultations score in Kazakhstan was 0.201 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.51 in 2022.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.18 in 1936.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for elite consultations score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 115th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 125.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Elite consultations score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).