Elite Consultations Score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Elite Consultations Score was 0.201 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
0.201
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
115th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.51
in 2022
All-time low
-2.18
in 1936
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Kazakhstan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.201 for elite consultations score in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 125.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Kazakhstan peaked at 0.51 in 2022 and was at its lowest, -2.18, in 1936.
Kazakhstan ranks 115th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Elite Consultations Score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.1 | — |
| 1790 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.1 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -11.1% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.8 | -3.3% |
| 1859 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.06 | -41.2% |
| 1907 | -1.04 | -2.0% |
| 1908 | -1.1 | +5.9% |
| 1909 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.695 | -36.9% |
| 1918 | -0.635 | -8.6% |
| 1919 | -0.808 | +27.2% |
| 1920 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.99 | +22.5% |
| 1923 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.26 | +27.3% |
| 1926 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.53 | +21.4% |
| 1930 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.02 | +31.8% |
| 1934 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.18 | +8.3% |
| 1937 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1947 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.448 | -74.9% |
| 1955 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.556 | +24.1% |
| 1966 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.211 | -62.1% |
| 1986 | -0.374 | +77.3% |
| 1987 | -0.243 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | -0.243 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.015 | -93.8% |
| 1990 | -0.414 | +2660.0% |
| 1991 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.414 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.759 | +83.3% |
| 1997 | -0.759 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.952 | +25.4% |
| 1999 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.952 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.902 | -5.3% |
| 2011 | -0.902 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.902 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.804 | -10.9% |
| 2014 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.804 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.69 | -14.2% |
| 2017 | -1.02 | +48.4% |
| 2018 | -1.02 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.146 | -114.3% |
| 2020 | 0.153 | +4.8% |
| 2021 | 0.153 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.51 | +233.3% |
| 2023 | 0.201 | -60.6% |
| 2024 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.201 | +0.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.201 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478, 42% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.201 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 14% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.1 | -2.1 | -2.1 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.89 | -2.1 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.85 | -1.87 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.51 | -1.8 | -1.04 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.9845 | -1.1 | -0.635 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.12 | -1.53 | -0.808 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.94 | -2.18 | -1.53 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.18 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.982 | -1.78 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.502 | -0.556 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.556 | -0.556 | -0.556 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3866 | -0.556 | -0.015 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.5906 | -0.952 | -0.414 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.952 | -0.952 | -0.952 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.771 | -1.02 | 0.146 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2365 | 0.153 | 0.51 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Kazakhstan?
- Elite consultations score in Kazakhstan was 0.201 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.51 in 2022.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.18 in 1936.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for elite consultations score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 115th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 125.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.