Elite Consultations Score in Georgia
Georgia: Elite Consultations Score was 0.75 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.75
Change on year
down 20.4%
World rank
83rd
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.18
in 2019
All-time low
-2.18
in 1936
Years of data
225
1801–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Georgia, 1801–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for elite consultations score in Georgia is 0.75, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 20.4% on the previous year and down 10.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Georgia peaked at 1.18 in 2019 and was at its lowest, -2.18, in 1936.
That places Georgia 83rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1801 | -1.87 | — |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.8 | -3.3% |
| 1859 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.06 | -41.2% |
| 1907 | -1.04 | -2.0% |
| 1908 | -1.1 | +5.9% |
| 1909 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.1 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.695 | -36.9% |
| 1918 | -0.635 | -8.6% |
| 1919 | -0.808 | +27.2% |
| 1920 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.808 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.99 | +22.5% |
| 1923 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.99 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.26 | +27.3% |
| 1926 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.26 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.53 | +21.4% |
| 1930 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -2.02 | +31.8% |
| 1934 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -2.02 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -2.18 | +8.3% |
| 1937 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1947 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.78 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.448 | -74.9% |
| 1955 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.448 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.556 | +24.1% |
| 1966 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.556 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.211 | -62.1% |
| 1986 | -0.374 | +77.3% |
| 1987 | -0.243 | -35.0% |
| 1988 | -0.243 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.015 | -93.8% |
| 1990 | -1.34 | +8840.0% |
| 1991 | -1.34 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -2.13 | +59.2% |
| 1993 | -1.2 | -43.9% |
| 1994 | -0.319 | -73.4% |
| 1995 | -0.135 | -57.7% |
| 1996 | -0.135 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.135 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.135 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.135 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.001 | -100.7% |
| 2001 | -0.146 | -14700.0% |
| 2002 | -0.146 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.021 | -85.6% |
| 2004 | 0.029 | -238.1% |
| 2005 | 0.029 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.064 | +120.7% |
| 2007 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.172 | +168.7% |
| 2009 | 0.172 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.298 | +73.3% |
| 2011 | 0.298 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.298 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.854 | +186.6% |
| 2014 | 0.836 | -2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.945 | +13.0% |
| 2017 | 0.974 | +3.1% |
| 2018 | 1.05 | +7.5% |
| 2019 | 1.18 | +12.6% |
| 2020 | 1.15 | -2.8% |
| 2021 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.942 | -17.8% |
| 2025 | 0.75 | -20.4% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 0.75 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 0.75 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 51% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 9 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.85 | -1.87 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.81 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.51 | -1.8 | -1.04 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.9845 | -1.1 | -0.635 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.12 | -1.53 | -0.808 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.94 | -2.18 | -1.53 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.02 | -2.18 | -1.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.982 | -1.78 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.502 | -0.556 | -0.448 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.556 | -0.556 | -0.556 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.3866 | -0.556 | -0.015 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.7008 | -2.13 | -0.135 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0218 | -0.146 | 0.172 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.7565 | 0.298 | 1.18 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.05 | 0.75 | 1.15 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 80 Morocco 0.873 compare
- 81 Liberia 0.831 compare
- 82 Gambia 0.806 compare
- 84 Cape Verde 0.731 compare
- 85 Papua New Guinea 0.721 compare
- 86 Sao Tome and Principe 0.715 compare
More reference data data for Georgia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.097 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.684 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0278 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3252 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2904 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Georgia?
- Elite consultations score in Georgia was 0.75 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.18 in 2019.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.18 in 1936.
- How does Georgia rank for elite consultations score?
- Georgia ranks 83rd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 225 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.