Elite consultations score in Finland
Finland: Elite consultations score was 2.38 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
2.38
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
15th
of 176 countries
All-time high
3.27
in 1982
All-time low
-1.06
in 1789
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite consultations score in Finland, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, elite consultations score in Finland stood at 2.38.
The figure is down 19.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Finland peaked at 3.27 in 1982 and was at its lowest, -1.06, in 1789.
That places Finland 15th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite consultations score in Finland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.06 | — |
| 1790 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.06 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.05 | -1.1% |
| 1810 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.683 | -34.7% |
| 1864 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.683 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.07 | -89.8% |
| 1907 | -0.059 | -15.7% |
| 1908 | -0.461 | +681.4% |
| 1909 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.461 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.238 | -151.6% |
| 1918 | 0.055 | -76.9% |
| 1919 | 0.643 | +1069.1% |
| 1920 | 1.04 | +61.9% |
| 1921 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 1.04 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.518 | -50.2% |
| 1931 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.518 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.764 | +47.5% |
| 1937 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.764 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.482 | -36.9% |
| 1940 | 0.482 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.266 | -44.8% |
| 1942 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.266 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.492 | +85.0% |
| 1946 | 1.15 | +133.1% |
| 1947 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1.15 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 1.58 | +37.5% |
| 1961 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 1.58 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 1.85 | +17.1% |
| 1969 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 1.85 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 2.15 | +16.3% |
| 1981 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 3.27 | +52.5% |
| 1983 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 3.27 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.6 | -20.5% |
| 1994 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 3.1 | +19.0% |
| 1996 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.1 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.73 | -11.9% |
| 2012 | 2.73 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.95 | +8.2% |
| 2014 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.95 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.38 | -19.2% |
| 2024 | 2.38 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.38 | +0.0% |
Finland compared with similar countries
- Finland's 2.38 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.69, 1.4× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Finland's 2.38 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.46, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.06 | -1.06 | -1.06 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.06 | -1.06 | -1.06 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.06 | -1.06 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.05 | -1.05 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.05 | -1.05 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.05 | -1.05 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.05 | -1.05 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.05 | -1.05 | -1.05 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.7919 | -1.05 | -0.683 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.683 | -0.683 | -0.683 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.683 | -0.683 | -0.683 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.683 | -0.683 | -0.683 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.5149 | -0.683 | -0.059 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.2291 | -0.461 | 0.643 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5882 | 0.482 | 0.764 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6626 | 0.266 | 1.15 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.63 | 1.58 | 1.85 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.85 | 1.85 | 1.85 | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.05 | 2.15 | 3.27 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.05 | 2.6 | 3.27 | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.92 | 2.73 | 3.1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.67 | 2.38 | 2.95 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Finland
More reference data data for Finland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2998 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1241 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1748 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6733 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9518 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Finland?
- Elite consultations score in Finland was 2.38 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 3.27 in 1982.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.06 in 1789.
- How does Finland rank for elite consultations score?
- Finland ranks 15th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Elite consultations score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).