Elite Consultations Score in Cuba
Cuba: Elite Consultations Score was -0.322 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.322
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
135th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.48
in 1940
All-time low
-1.82
in 1961
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded -0.322 for elite consultations score in 2025.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Cuba peaked at 2.48 in 1940 and was at its lowest, -1.82, in 1961.
That places Cuba 135th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.858 | — |
| 1790 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.858 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | 1.15 | -234.4% |
| 1899 | 1.73 | +50.2% |
| 1900 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 1.73 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.13 | -34.6% |
| 1926 | 0.286 | -74.7% |
| 1927 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.809 | -382.9% |
| 1929 | -0.809 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.809 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.809 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.809 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.809 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.93 | -215.0% |
| 1935 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.93 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 2.48 | +167.1% |
| 1941 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2.48 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.354 | -114.3% |
| 1954 | -0.354 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.354 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.354 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.794 | +124.3% |
| 1958 | -0.794 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.228 | -128.7% |
| 1960 | -0.934 | -509.6% |
| 1961 | -1.82 | +95.3% |
| 1962 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.82 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.923 | -49.4% |
| 1977 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.923 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.702 | -23.9% |
| 1988 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.606 | -13.7% |
| 2008 | -0.322 | -46.9% |
| 2009 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2022 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's -0.322 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.478. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's -0.322 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 1. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.858 | -0.858 | -0.858 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.3979 | -0.858 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.8746 | -0.809 | 1.73 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.2344 | -0.809 | 0.93 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.48 | 2.48 | 2.48 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.4676 | -0.794 | 2.48 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.74 | -1.82 | -0.934 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.46 | -1.82 | -0.923 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.8567 | -0.923 | -0.702 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.702 | -0.702 | -0.702 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.6164 | -0.702 | -0.322 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.322 | -0.322 | -0.322 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.322 | -0.322 | -0.322 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Cuba?
- Elite consultations score in Cuba was -0.322 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 2.48 in 1940.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.82 in 1961.
- How does Cuba rank for elite consultations score?
- Cuba ranks 135th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.