Elite Consultations Score in Bangladesh
Bangladesh: Elite Consultations Score was 0.221 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.221
Change on year
down 44.9%
World rank
111th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.401
in 2024
All-time low
-2.25
in 1789
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Elite Consultations Score in Bangladesh, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, elite consultations score in Bangladesh stood at 0.221.
That represents a change of down 44.9% on the previous year and up 153.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, elite consultations score in Bangladesh peaked at 0.401 in 2024 and was at its lowest, -2.25, in 1789.
That places Bangladesh 111th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Elite Consultations Score in Bangladesh, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.25 | — |
| 1790 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.25 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.64 | -27.5% |
| 1863 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.64 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.29 | -21.2% |
| 1910 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -0.959 | -25.6% |
| 1937 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -0.959 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.093 | -109.7% |
| 1948 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.093 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.44 | -1648.4% |
| 1959 | -1.85 | +28.3% |
| 1960 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.85 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.592 | -67.9% |
| 1970 | -0.613 | +3.5% |
| 1971 | -1.28 | +108.3% |
| 1972 | 0.012 | -100.9% |
| 1973 | 0.012 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.317 | -2741.7% |
| 1975 | -0.556 | +75.4% |
| 1976 | -0.94 | +69.1% |
| 1977 | -0.322 | -65.7% |
| 1978 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.322 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.775 | +140.7% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | +55.6% |
| 1983 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.771 | -36.1% |
| 1985 | -0.771 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.346 | -55.1% |
| 1987 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.101 | -70.8% |
| 1993 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.504 | +399.0% |
| 1997 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.504 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.427 | -15.3% |
| 2008 | -0.427 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.346 | -19.0% |
| 2010 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.429 | +24.0% |
| 2012 | -0.429 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.429 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.429 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.414 | -3.5% |
| 2016 | -0.121 | -70.8% |
| 2017 | -0.121 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.469 | +287.6% |
| 2019 | -0.149 | -68.2% |
| 2020 | -0.46 | +208.7% |
| 2021 | -0.503 | +9.3% |
| 2022 | -0.503 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.138 | -127.4% |
| 2024 | 0.401 | +190.6% |
| 2025 | 0.221 | -44.9% |
Bangladesh compared with similar countries
- Bangladesh's 0.221 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.213, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Bangladesh's 0.221 is below the median for South Asia, which is 0.591, 37% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.25 | -2.25 | -2.25 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.76 | -2.25 | -1.64 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.64 | -1.64 | -1.64 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.64 | -1.64 | -1.64 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.64 | -1.64 | -1.64 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.6 | -1.64 | -1.29 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.29 | -1.29 | -1.29 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.29 | -1.29 | -1.29 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.16 | -1.29 | -0.959 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.6434 | -0.959 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.2543 | -1.85 | 0.093 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.72 | -1.85 | -0.592 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.4645 | -1.28 | 0.012 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.6435 | -1.21 | -0.322 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.3112 | -0.504 | -0.101 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.4728 | -0.504 | -0.346 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.3336 | -0.469 | -0.121 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1177 | -0.503 | 0.401 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bangladesh
More reference data data for Bangladesh
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 24.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 37.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 105.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 14.25 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is elite consultations score in Bangladesh?
- Elite consultations score in Bangladesh was 0.221 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest elite consultations score recorded in Bangladesh?
- The highest recorded value was 0.401 in 2024.
- What is the lowest elite consultations score recorded in Bangladesh?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.25 in 1789.
- How does Bangladesh rank for elite consultations score?
- Bangladesh ranks 111th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is elite consultations score rising or falling in Bangladesh?
- Over the last ten years it is up 153.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Elite Consultations Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites consult other elites across the political spectrum and from relevant sectors of society and business when considering important policy changes.