Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Ukraine
Ukraine: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.95 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Ukraine, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Ukraine stood at 0.95.
That represents a change of up 35.7% over ten years.
Ukraine ranks 29th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Ukraine, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.7 | — |
| 2017 | 0.75 | +7.1% |
| 2018 | 0.85 | +13.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | +17.6% |
| 2020 | 0.95 | -5.0% |
| 2021 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.95 | +0.0% |
Ukraine compared with similar countries
- Ukraine's 0.95 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.65, 1.5× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ukraine's 0.95 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.95, 1.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.825 | 0.7 | 1 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ukraine
More reference data data for Ukraine
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.47 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Ukraine?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Ukraine was 0.95 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Ukraine?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2019.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Ukraine?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.7 in 2016.
- How does Ukraine rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Ukraine ranks 29th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Ukraine?
- Over the last ten years it is up 35.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ukraine data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.