Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Tanzania
Tanzania: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.55 in 2023. ▬ Flat
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Tanzania, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Tanzania recorded 0.55 for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places Tanzania 114th out of 188 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4875 | 0.4 | 0.55 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.5125 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 114 Afghanistan 0.55 compare
- 114 Belize 0.55 compare
- 114 Bolivia 0.55 compare
- 114 Cape Verde 0.55 compare
- 114 Cambodia 0.55 compare
- 114 Cameroon 0.55 compare
- 114 Gambia 0.55 compare
- 114 Guinea 0.55 compare
- 114 Morocco 0.55 compare
- 114 Nepal 0.55 compare
- 114 Nicaragua 0.55 compare
- 114 Peru 0.55 compare
- 114 San Marino 0.55 compare
- 114 Saint Lucia 0.55 compare
- 114 Suriname 0.55 compare
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Tanzania?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Tanzania was 0.55 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.55 in 2016.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4 in 2018.
- How does Tanzania rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Tanzania ranks 114th out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.