Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Somalia
Somalia: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.45 in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Somalia, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Somalia stood at 0.45. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
The figure is up 12.5% on the previous year.
That places Somalia 142nd out of 188 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.3125 | 0.1 | 0.45 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Somalia
- 142 Antigua and Barbuda 0.45 compare
- 142 Bhutan 0.45 compare
- 142 Burundi 0.45 compare
- 142 Central African Republic 0.45 compare
- 142 Chad 0.45 compare
- 142 Ethiopia 0.45 compare
- 142 Gabon 0.45 compare
- 142 Guyana 0.45 compare
- 142 India 0.45 compare
- 142 Iran 0.45 compare
- 142 Jamaica 0.45 compare
- 142 Madagascar 0.45 compare
- 142 Malawi 0.45 compare
- 142 Mali 0.45 compare
- 142 Sierra Leone 0.45 compare
- 142 Solomon Islands 0.45 compare
- 142 Tonga 0.45 compare
More reference data data for Somalia
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.4444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3652 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 234.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 96.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 28,272 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 71.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1,010 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2685 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Somalia?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Somalia was 0.45 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Somalia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.45 in 2023.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Somalia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2016.
- How does Somalia rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Somalia ranks 142nd out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this Somalia data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.