Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.3 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Papua New Guinea, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Papua New Guinea stood at 0.3. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 100.0% over ten years.
Papua New Guinea ranks 174th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.175 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.2875 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 174 Dominica 0.3 compare
- 174 South Sudan 0.3 compare
- 174 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0.3 compare
- 174 Sudan 0.3 compare
- 174 Tajikistan 0.3 compare
More reference data data for Papua New Guinea
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6846 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0038 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5295 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3515 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Papua New Guinea?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Papua New Guinea was 0.3 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3 in 2021.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.15 in 2016.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 174th out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.