Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kiribati
Kiribati: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.35 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kiribati, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 0.35 for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of up 40.0% on the previous year and up 75.0% over ten years.
Kiribati ranks 172nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.2 | — |
| 2017 | 0.15 | -25.0% |
| 2018 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.25 | +66.7% |
| 2022 | 0.25 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.35 | +40.0% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 0.35 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.55, 64% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 0.35 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.6, 58% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1625 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.25 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 172 Equatorial Guinea 0.35 compare
- 172 Laos 0.35 compare
- 172 Sao Tome and Principe 0.35 compare
- 172 Vanuatu 0.35 compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2183 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 0.7542 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 12.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 11.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.4165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 0.2183 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 5.35 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Kiribati?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Kiribati was 0.35 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 0.35 in 2023.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.15 in 2017.
- How does Kiribati rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Kiribati ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.