Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods was 0.8 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Burkina Faso, 2016–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Burkina Faso is 0.8, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
That represents a change of up 33.3% on the previous year and up 220.0% over ten years.
Burkina Faso ranks 61st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods in Burkina Faso, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.25 | — |
| 2017 | 0.35 | +40.0% |
| 2018 | 0.35 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.35 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.45 | +28.6% |
| 2021 | 0.6 | +33.3% |
| 2022 | 0.6 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.8 | +33.3% |
Burkina Faso compared with similar countries
- Burkina Faso's 0.8 is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.45, 1.8× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Burkina Faso's 0.8 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.55, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.325 | 0.25 | 0.35 | 4 |
| 2020s | 0.6125 | 0.45 | 0.8 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Burkina Faso
- 61 Azerbaijan 0.8 compare
- 61 Guatemala 0.8 compare
- 61 Montenegro 0.8 compare
- 61 North Macedonia 0.8 compare
- 61 Singapore 0.8 compare
More reference data data for Burkina Faso
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4137 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 33.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 45.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.25 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Burkina Faso?
- Dimension 5.2: standards and methods in Burkina Faso was 0.8 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8 in 2023.
- What is the lowest dimension 5.2: standards and methods recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.25 in 2016.
- How does Burkina Faso rank for dimension 5.2: standards and methods?
- Burkina Faso ranks 61st out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 5.2: standards and methods rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
- Over the last ten years it is up 220.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 5.2: Standards and Methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Standards and Methods indicators. Internationally accepted and recommended methodology, classifications and standards provide the basis for national statistical offices (NSOs) on data integration, facilitating data exchange and providing the foundation for the preparation of relevant statistical indicators. The following methods and standards are considered: System of national accounts in use, National Accounts base year, Classification of national industry, CPI base year, Classification of household consumption, Classification of status of employment, Central government accounting status, Compilation of government finance statistics, Compilation of monetary and financial statistics, Business process. . Further work could improve the validity of this indicator and reduce the risk that countries may be incentivized to adopt only traditional standards and methods and neglect innovative solutions that may be more valid in the current context.