Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary

Hungary: Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data was 0.292 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.292
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
81st
of 180 countries
All-time high
0.361
in 2020
All-time low
0.13
in 2017
Years of data
8
2016–2023

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary, 2016–2023

00.10.20.30.42016201920232016: 0.292017: 0.132018: 0.132019: 0.132020: 0.3612021: 0.3612022: 0.2922023: 0.292

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

In 2023, dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Hungary stood at 0.292.

The figure is up 0.7% over ten years.

That places Hungary 81st out of 180 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary, 2016 to 2023.
Year Value Change
2016 0.29
2017 0.13 -55.2%
2018 0.13 +0.0%
2019 0.13 +0.0%
2020 0.361 +177.7%
2021 0.361 +0.0%
2022 0.292 -19.1%
2023 0.292 +0.0%

Hungary compared with similar countries

  • Hungary's 0.292 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.334, 87% of the median. (57 countries reporting)
  • Hungary's 0.292 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.298, 98% of the median. (50 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.17 0.13 0.29 4
2020s 0.3265 0.292 0.361 4

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 79 Guinea 0.295 compare
  2. 79 Honduras 0.295 compare
  3. 81 France 0.292 compare
  4. 81 Serbia 0.292 compare
  5. 81 Vanuatu 0.292 compare
  6. 81 Zambia 0.292 compare

See the full ranking of 180 places →

More reference data data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Hungary?
Dimension 4.3: geospatial data in Hungary was 0.292 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 0.361 in 2020.
What is the lowest dimension 4.3: geospatial data recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 0.13 in 2017.
How does Hungary rank for dimension 4.3: geospatial data?
Hungary ranks 81st out of 180 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 4.3: geospatial data rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/dimension-4-3-geospatial-data/hungary/">Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 4.3: Geospatial Data
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
180 places, 1,560 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

Geospatial data available at 1st Admin Level. We recognize that this data source provides only limited coverage but consider that it does at least provide some indication of the ability of the national statistical system to produce geospatial data. A major research and data collection effort is needed via GGIM to fill in this information, so that a more comprehensive picture of geospatial data capability at the national level can be produced. Until this is done, it we cannot even assess the scale of the data gaps in a comparable way.