Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics in China
China: Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics was 0.734 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics in China, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
In 2023, dimension 3.1: social statistics in China stood at 0.734.
That represents a change of up 7.2% on the previous year and up 35.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 3.1: social statistics in China peaked at 0.74 in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.4352, in 2004.
China ranks 104th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics in China, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0.4352 | — |
| 2005 | 0.4877 | +12.1% |
| 2006 | 0.5022 | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.526 | +4.7% |
| 2008 | 0.5498 | +4.5% |
| 2009 | 0.5498 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.5622 | +2.2% |
| 2011 | 0.5682 | +1.1% |
| 2012 | 0.5682 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.5413 | -4.7% |
| 2014 | 0.5245 | -3.1% |
| 2015 | 0.5723 | +9.1% |
| 2016 | 0.5922 | +3.5% |
| 2017 | 0.6255 | +5.6% |
| 2018 | 0.613 | -2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.5978 | -2.5% |
| 2020 | 0.6677 | +11.7% |
| 2021 | 0.74 | +10.8% |
| 2022 | 0.6847 | -7.5% |
| 2023 | 0.734 | +7.2% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 0.734 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.7672, 96% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- China's 0.734 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.645, 1.1× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5084 | 0.4352 | 0.5498 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.5765 | 0.5245 | 0.6255 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7066 | 0.6677 | 0.74 | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 3.1: social statistics in China?
- Dimension 3.1: social statistics in China was 0.734 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 3.1: social statistics recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 0.74 in 2021.
- What is the lowest dimension 3.1: social statistics recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4352 in 2004.
- How does China rank for dimension 3.1: social statistics?
- China ranks 104th out of 215 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 3.1: social statistics rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 35.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 3.1: Social Statistics. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Average score for Goal 1-6 indicators. The primary data source is the UN SDG database. Whilst this is a database with comprehensive coverage that all countries have signed up to, it is clear that many (particularly developed countries) are not yet submitting their available national data. Scores for these countries are likely to represent an indicator of their willingness to submit national data rather than their performance in calculating the indicators. For OECD countries, we supplement the UN SDG database with comparable data submitted to the OECD following the methodology in Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets 2019: An Assessment of Where OECD Countries Stand (https://www.oecd.org/sdd/measuring-distance-to-the-sdg-targets-2019-a8caf3fa-en.htm).