Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score in YEM

YEM: Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score was 0 in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0
World rank
110th
of 177 countries
All-time high
0.117
in 2016
All-time low
0
in 2015
Years of data
9
2015–2023

Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score in YEM, 2015–2023

00.0250.050.0750.10.1252015201920232015: 02016: 0.1172017: 0.1172018: 0.1172019: 0.1172020: 02021: 02022: 02023: 0

Source: Open Data Watch.

Analysis

YEM recorded 0 for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.

That represents a change of down 100.0% over five years.

Over the whole period, dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score in YEM peaked at 0.117 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2015.

YEM ranks 110th of 177 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.0936 0 0.117 5
2020s 0 0 0 4

Countries ranked near YEM

  1. 107 MOZ 0.017 compare
  2. 107 CHE 0.017 compare
  3. 107 TTO 0.017 compare
  4. 110 AFG 0 compare
  5. 110 ALB 0 compare
  6. 110 DZA 0 compare
  7. 110 AGO 0 compare
  8. 110 ARM 0 compare
  9. 110 AZE 0 compare
  10. 110 BHS 0 compare
  11. 110 BGD 0 compare
  12. 110 BLR 0 compare
  13. 110 BLZ 0 compare
  14. 110 BTN 0 compare
  15. 110 BOL 0 compare
  16. 110 CPV 0 compare
  17. 110 KHM 0 compare
  18. 110 TCD 0 compare
  19. 110 CHN 0 compare
  20. 110 COG 0 compare
  21. 110 CIV 0 compare
  22. 110 CUB 0 compare
  23. 110 DOM 0 compare
  24. 110 EGY 0 compare
  25. 110 SLV 0 compare
  26. 110 SWZ 0 compare
  27. 110 ETH 0 compare
  28. 110 FJI 0 compare
  29. 110 GHA 0 compare
  30. 110 GTM 0 compare
  31. 110 GNB 0 compare
  32. 110 HTI 0 compare
  33. 110 HND 0 compare
  34. 110 HUN 0 compare
  35. 110 ISL 0 compare
  36. 110 IRN 0 compare
  37. 110 KEN 0 compare
  38. 110 KIR 0 compare
  39. 110 KWT 0 compare
  40. 110 LAO 0 compare
  41. 110 LBN 0 compare
  42. 110 LBR 0 compare
  43. 110 LBY 0 compare
  44. 110 MDG 0 compare
  45. 110 MDV 0 compare
  46. 110 MHL 0 compare
  47. 110 FSM 0 compare
  48. 110 MMR 0 compare
  49. 110 NPL 0 compare
  50. 110 NIC 0 compare
  51. 110 NER 0 compare
  52. 110 NGA 0 compare
  53. 110 PAK 0 compare
  54. 110 PNG 0 compare
  55. 110 QAT 0 compare
  56. 110 WSM 0 compare
  57. 110 STP 0 compare
  58. 110 SLB 0 compare
  59. 110 LKA 0 compare
  60. 110 SDN 0 compare
  61. 110 SYR 0 compare
  62. 110 TJK 0 compare
  63. 110 THA 0 compare
  64. 110 TLS 0 compare
  65. 110 TGO 0 compare
  66. 110 TKM 0 compare
  67. 110 UGA 0 compare
  68. 110 VUT 0 compare
  69. 110 VEN 0 compare
  70. 110 VNM 0 compare

See the full ranking of 179 places →

More reference data data for YEM

All data for YEM →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score in YEM?
Dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score in YEM was 0 in 2023, according to Open Data Watch.
What is the highest dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score recorded in YEM?
The highest recorded value was 0.117 in 2016.
What is the lowest dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score recorded in YEM?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2015.
How does YEM rank for dimension 2.2: online access - terms of use score?
YEM ranks 110th out of 177 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this YEM data come from?
The figures come from Open Data Watch, published as part of Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 2.2: Online access - Terms of Use Score
Source
Open Data Watch
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 1,551 data points, 2015–2023
Last refreshed

This openness element measures whether data are made available under an open license. Open licenses must allow the use, reuse, and sharing or adaption of data for commercial and noncommercial use without any obligation other than attribution, per the Open Definition. Licenses prohibiting commercial use or having two or more additional stipulations are classified as “Not Open”. Licenses with no more than one additional stipulation are classified as “Some Restrictions.” Licenses that do not explicitly state all allowed uses under the Open Definition and do not include restrictive language are also classified as “Some Restrictions.”