Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Libya
Libya: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.2 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Libya, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
Libya recorded 0.2 for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Libya peaked at 0.4 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.2, in 2004.
Libya ranks 212th of 214 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.32 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Libya
- 212 Micronesia (country) 0.2 compare
- 214 North Korea 0.1 compare
More reference data data for Libya
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 56.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 2,049 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 139.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 30.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,541 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 23.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 2,614 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 4,806 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8811 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Libya?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Libya was 0.2 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Libya?
- The highest recorded value was 0.4 in 2012.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Libya?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2 in 2004.
- How does Libya rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- Libya ranks 212th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Libya?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Libya data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further