Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Eritrea

Eritrea: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.366 in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.366
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
204th
of 214 countries
All-time high
0.366
in 2020
All-time low
0.166
in 2016
Years of data
20
2004–2023

Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Eritrea, 2004–2023

00.10.20.30.42004201320232004: 0.22005: 0.22006: 0.22007: 0.22008: 0.22009: 0.22010: 0.22011: 0.22012: 0.22013: 0.22014: 0.22015: 0.32016: 0.1662017: 0.1662018: 0.1662019: 0.1662020: 0.3662021: 0.3662022: 0.3662023: 0.366

Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).

Analysis

In 2023, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Eritrea stood at 0.366. That is the highest value across all 20 years on record.

The figure is up 83.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Eritrea peaked at 0.366 in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.166, in 2016.

Eritrea ranks 204th of 214 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.2 0.2 0.2 6
2010s 0.1964 0.166 0.3 10
2020s 0.366 0.366 0.366 4

Countries ranked near Eritrea

  1. 204 Yemen 0.366 compare
  2. 206 Cayman Islands 0.3 compare
  3. 206 Equatorial Guinea 0.3 compare
  4. 206 Marshall Islands 0.3 compare
  5. 206 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0.3 compare
  6. 206 Solomon Islands 0.3 compare
  7. 206 Turks and Caicos Islands 0.3 compare

See the full ranking of 217 places →

More reference data data for Eritrea

All data for Eritrea →

Frequently asked questions

What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Eritrea?
Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Eritrea was 0.366 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Eritrea?
The highest recorded value was 0.366 in 2020.
What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Eritrea?
The lowest recorded value was 0.166 in 2016.
How does Eritrea rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
Eritrea ranks 204th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Eritrea?
Over the last ten years it is up 83.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Eritrea data come from?
The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
217 places, 4,340 data points, 2004–2023
Last refreshed

Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further