Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Belarus
Belarus: Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations was 0.866 in 2023. ▲ Rising
Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations in Belarus, 2004–2023
Source: Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
Analysis
The most recent figure for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Belarus is 0.866, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.4% on the previous year and up 73.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Belarus peaked at 1 in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.4, in 2004.
That places Belarus 98th out of 214 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 6 |
| 2010s | 0.71 | 0.5 | 1 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9665 | 0.866 | 1 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 756.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 21.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,429 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1,107 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 518.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 3.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 5,669 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0133 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 487.54 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Belarus?
- Dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations in Belarus was 0.866 in 2023, according to Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators).
- What is the highest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 2016.
- What is the lowest dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4 in 2004.
- How does Belarus rank for dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations?
- Belarus ranks 98th out of 214 countries with data for 2023.
- Is dimension 1.5: data use by international organizations rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 73.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators), published as part of Dimension 1.5: Data use by international organizations. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Five measures usefulness or reliability of country produced measures for international organizations. First, on comparability of poverty estimates for the World Bank reporting on international poverty (Source: Povcalnet). Second on usable surveys for statistics on child mortality for the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (Source: https://childmortality.org/). Third on accuracy of debt reporting as classified by the World Bank (Source: World Bank WDI metadata). Fourth, on availability of safely managed drinking water data for use by JMP. Fifth, on labor force participation data for use by ILO. We recognize that these data sources provide only partial coverage but consider that they do at least provide some indication of the performance of the national statistical system. With more complete data sources it would be possible to assess this further