Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland

Poland: Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban was 30.8% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
30.8%
Change on year
down 11.6%
World rank
9th
of 37 countries
All-time high
40.0%
in 2005
All-time low
30.8%
in 2019
Years of data
12
2005–2019

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland, 2005–2019

0102030402005201220192005: 402006: 38.52007: 35.72008: 33.52009: 33.42010: 32.12011: 32.52012: 34.22015: 38.92016: 37.42017: 34.82019: 30.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 30.8% for coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of down 11.6% on the previous year and down 7.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Poland peaked at 40.0% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 30.8%, in 2019.

That places Poland 9th out of 37 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland, 2005 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2005 40.0% —
2006 38.5% -3.7%
2007 35.7% -7.4%
2008 33.5% -6.2%
2009 33.4% -0.2%
2010 32.1% -4.0%
2011 32.5% +1.4%
2012 34.2% +5.0%
2015 38.9% +13.7%
2016 37.4% -3.7%
2017 34.8% -6.8%
2019 30.8% -11.6%

Poland compared with similar countries

  • Poland's 30.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 17.8%, 1.7× the median. (6 countries reporting)
  • Poland's 30.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.5%, 1.8× the median. (12 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 36.2% 33.4% 40.0% 5
2010s 34.4% 30.8% 38.9% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 6 Pakistan 42.9% compare
  2. 7 Honduras 42.2% compare
  3. 8 El Salvador 34.8% compare
  4. 10 Cote d'Ivoire 30.5% compare
  5. 11 Moldova 28.6% compare
  6. 12 Burkina Faso 26.9% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More reference data data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Poland?
Coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban in Poland was 30.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 40.0% in 2005.
What is the lowest coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 30.8% in 2019.
How does Poland rank for coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban?
Poland ranks 9th out of 37 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage (%) - all private transfers -urban rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is down 7.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/poland/">Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 361 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)