Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban was 34.0% in 2021. ▼ Falling
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Dominican Republic, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban in Dominican Republic is 34.0%, measured in 2021.
That represents a change of up 5.3% on the previous year and down 21.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban in Dominican Republic peaked at 46.2% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 29.3%, in 2018.
Dominican Republic ranks 9th of 37 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 14 years of available data.
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 41.7% | — |
| 2008 | 30.6% | -26.5% |
| 2009 | 41.0% | +34.0% |
| 2010 | 35.2% | -14.2% |
| 2011 | 43.2% | +22.6% |
| 2012 | 39.1% | -9.4% |
| 2013 | 35.3% | -9.8% |
| 2014 | 46.2% | +30.8% |
| 2015 | 32.4% | -29.9% |
| 2016 | 32.2% | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 35.6% | +10.8% |
| 2018 | 29.3% | -17.7% |
| 2019 | 32.3% | +10.3% |
| 2021 | 34.0% | +5.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.8% | 30.6% | 41.7% | 3 |
| 2010s | 36.1% | 29.3% | 46.2% | 10 |
| 2020s | 34.0% | 34.0% | 34.0% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
- 6 Poland 37.7% compare
- 7 Republic of Moldova 34.9% compare
- 8 El Salvador 34.6% compare
- 10 Burkina Faso 32.4% compare
- 11 Côte d'Ivoire 31.0% compare
- 12 Armenia 28.4% compare
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban in Dominican Republic?
- Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban in Dominican Republic was 34.0% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 46.2% in 2014.
- What is the lowest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 29.3% in 2018.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban?
- Dominican Republic ranks 9th out of 37 countries with data for 2021.
- Is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -urban rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)