Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus
Belarus: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 57.1% in 2019. ▬ Flat
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 57.1% for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural in 2019.
That represents a change of up 2.0% on the previous year and down 8.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus peaked at 62.5% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 47.3%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 3rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 47.3% | — |
| 2009 | 62.5% | +32.3% |
| 2010 | 60.1% | -3.9% |
| 2012 | 50.4% | -16.2% |
| 2013 | 54.7% | +8.7% |
| 2014 | 57.6% | +5.3% |
| 2015 | 61.6% | +7.0% |
| 2016 | 60.2% | -2.3% |
| 2017 | 53.8% | -10.7% |
| 2018 | 56.0% | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 57.1% | +2.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 57.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 21.0%, 2.7× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 57.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 21.8%, 2.6× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.9% | 47.3% | 62.5% | 2 |
| 2010s | 56.8% | 50.4% | 61.6% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus?
- Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural in Belarus was 57.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 62.5% in 2009.
- What is the lowest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 47.3% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural?
- Belarus ranks 3rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)