How does Poland rank for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers?

Poland ranks 7th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.

Is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Poland?

Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Poland data come from?

The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland

Name: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland
Creator: ASPIRE
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Poland: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers was 36.7% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

36.7%

Change on year

down 12.6%

World rank

7th

of 35 countries

All-time high

45.8%

in 2015

All-time low

35.6%

in 2010

Years of data

2005–2019

Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Poland, 2005–2019

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.

Analysis

The most recent figure for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers in Poland is 36.7%, measured in 2019.

That represents a change of down 12.6% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers in Poland peaked at 45.8% in 2015 and was at its lowest, 35.6%, in 2010.

Poland ranks 7th of 35 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	40.6%	37.4%	44.1%	5
2010s	39.8%	35.6%	45.8%	7

Countries ranked near Poland

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Poland

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.499 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8896 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 8.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.57 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.84 (2050)

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers in Poland?: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers in Poland was 36.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?: The highest recorded value was 45.8% in 2015.
What is the lowest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers recorded in Poland?: The lowest recorded value was 35.6% in 2010.
How does Poland rank for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers?: Poland ranks 7th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - all private transfers rising or falling in Poland?: Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Poland data come from?: The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - All Private Transfers (preT)
Unit: preT
Source: ASPIRE
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 36 places, 357 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed: 07 August 2026

Percentage of population participating in Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)