Control of Corruption in Mozambique
Mozambique: Control of Corruption was 0.1567 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption in Mozambique, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
In 2011, control of corruption in Mozambique stood at 0.1567 standard error.
That represents a change of down 2.4% on the previous year and down 35.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption in Mozambique peaked at 0.2959 standard error in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1516 standard error, in 2006.
Mozambique ranks 41st of 53 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Control of Corruption in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2959 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.1985 standard error | -32.9% |
| 2000 | 0.2425 standard error | +22.2% |
| 2002 | 0.1851 standard error | -23.7% |
| 2003 | 0.1889 standard error | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 0.1741 standard error | -7.8% |
| 2005 | 0.1749 standard error | +0.5% |
| 2006 | 0.1516 standard error | -13.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1566 standard error | +3.3% |
| 2008 | 0.1535 standard error | -2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.1613 standard error | +5.1% |
| 2010 | 0.1606 standard error | -0.5% |
| 2011 | 0.1567 standard error | -2.4% |
Mozambique compared with similar countries
- Mozambique's 0.1567 standard error is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.1776 standard error, 88% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Mozambique's 0.1567 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1749 standard error, 90% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2472 standard error | 0.1985 standard error | 0.2959 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1765 standard error | 0.1516 standard error | 0.2425 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1586 standard error | 0.1567 standard error | 0.1606 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
More reference data data for Mozambique
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2808 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 9.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.53 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption in Mozambique?
- Control of corruption in Mozambique was 0.1567 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest control of corruption recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2959 standard error in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1516 standard error in 2006.
- How does Mozambique rank for control of corruption?
- Mozambique ranks 41st out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is control of corruption rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is down 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Control of Corruption (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.CONT.CO.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.