Control of Corruption - Governance score in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea: Control of Corruption - Governance score was 31.72 0-100 in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
31.72 0-100
Change on year
down 11.1%
World rank
153rd
of 204 countries
All-time high
41.23 0-100
in 1996
All-time low
23.73 0-100
in 2005
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Control of Corruption - Governance score in Papua New Guinea, 1996–2024

0102030401996201020241996: 41.2 0-1001998: 40.4 0-1002000: 33.9 0-1002002: 30.6 0-1002003: 30.6 0-1002004: 25.5 0-1002005: 23.7 0-1002006: 26.5 0-1002007: 26.6 0-1002008: 26 0-1002009: 25.6 0-1002010: 28.2 0-1002011: 28.1 0-1002012: 27.5 0-1002013: 27.5 0-1002014: 28.1 0-1002015: 28.1 0-1002016: 27.9 0-1002017: 27.7 0-1002018: 28.8 0-1002019: 27.9 0-1002020: 36.8 0-1002021: 34.6 0-1002022: 35.9 0-1002023: 35.7 0-1002024: 31.7 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance score in Papua New Guinea is 31.72 0-100, measured in 2024.

That represents a change of down 11.1% on the previous year and up 12.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance score in Papua New Guinea peaked at 41.23 0-100 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 23.73 0-100, in 2005.

That places Papua New Guinea 153rd out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 40.84 0-100 40.44 0-100 41.23 0-100 2
2000s 27.68 0-100 23.73 0-100 33.91 0-100 9
2010s 28 0-100 27.54 0-100 28.83 0-100 10
2020s 34.93 0-100 31.72 0-100 36.75 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea

  1. 150 Azerbaijan 32.17 0-100 compare
  2. 151 Ecuador 32.15 0-100 compare
  3. 152 Eswatini 31.96 0-100 compare
  4. 154 Kenya 31.62 0-100 compare
  5. 155 Egypt 31.12 0-100 compare
  6. 156 Djibouti 29.82 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places →

More reference data data for Papua New Guinea

All data for Papua New Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is control of corruption - governance score in Papua New Guinea?
Control of corruption - governance score in Papua New Guinea was 31.72 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest control of corruption - governance score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 41.23 0-100 in 1996.
What is the lowest control of corruption - governance score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 23.73 0-100 in 2005.
How does Papua New Guinea rank for control of corruption - governance score?
Papua New Guinea ranks 153rd out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is control of corruption - governance score rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).