Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Tunisia
Tunisia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Tunisia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Tunisia recorded -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.4% on the previous year and down 1,860.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Tunisia peaked at 0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011 and was at its lowest, -0.3716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2000.
Tunisia ranks 100th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.3666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.3679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | -0.3716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.0% |
| 2002 | -0.0489 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -86.8% |
| 2003 | -0.2308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +372.1% |
| 2004 | -0.1548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.9% |
| 2005 | -0.2831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +82.9% |
| 2006 | -0.0584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -79.4% |
| 2007 | -0.1142 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +95.5% |
| 2008 | -0.2983 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +161.1% |
| 2009 | -0.2883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2010 | -0.1941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -126.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -96.8% |
| 2013 | -0.0118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -815.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0125 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -206.3% |
| 2015 | -0.0144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -214.9% |
| 2016 | -0.0578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +301.9% |
| 2017 | -0.049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -15.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -102.7% |
| 2019 | -0.0287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2243.5% |
| 2020 | -0.0193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -32.8% |
| 2021 | -0.1415 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +634.7% |
| 2022 | -0.1992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +40.8% |
| 2023 | -0.1924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2024 | -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.4% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7974 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 28% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.5708 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 39% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Tunisia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | -2243.5% | 0.0013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0287 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2013 | -815.0% | 0.0016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3666 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.2054 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0489 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1941 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1545 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Tunisia?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Tunisia was -0.2202 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2000.
- How does Tunisia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Tunisia ranks 100th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1,860.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.