Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Panama
Panama: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Panama, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Panama is -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.1% on the previous year and down 31.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Panama peaked at -0.2204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008 and was at its lowest, -0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2022.
Panama ranks 139th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Panama, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.3273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.3286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2000 | -0.4885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +48.7% |
| 2002 | -0.481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2003 | -0.4146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.8% |
| 2004 | -0.4063 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2005 | -0.4821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +18.7% |
| 2006 | -0.4352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.7% |
| 2007 | -0.4842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.3% |
| 2008 | -0.2204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -54.5% |
| 2009 | -0.3015 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +36.8% |
| 2010 | -0.3416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.3% |
| 2011 | -0.3492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2012 | -0.4597 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +31.7% |
| 2013 | -0.4303 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.4% |
| 2014 | -0.3934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2015 | -0.4237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.7% |
| 2016 | -0.4943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.6% |
| 2017 | -0.5584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.0% |
| 2018 | -0.5482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2019 | -0.544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2020 | -0.5197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.5% |
| 2021 | -0.5232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2022 | -0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.7% |
| 2023 | -0.551 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2024 | -0.5409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8% |
| 2025 | -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
Panama compared with similar countries
- Panama's -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (76 countries reporting)
- Panama's -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is -0.3085 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.8× the median. (37 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3279 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3286 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.4126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.4543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5584 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3416 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.5426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 136 Turkey -0.5281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 137 Algeria -0.5309 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 138 El Salvador -0.5474 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 140 Belarus -0.5723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 141 Philippines -0.5735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 142 Palestine -0.5839 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Panama
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1446 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6179 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0285 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2267 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1553 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Panama?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Panama was -0.5575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was -0.2204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2008.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.5635 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022.
- How does Panama rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Panama ranks 139th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.