Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus
Belarus: Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods was 45.9 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Latest (2019)
45.9
Change on year
down 22.6%
World rank
59th
of 113 countries
All-time high
59.27
in 2017
All-time low
42.1
in 1995
Years of data
5
1995–2019
Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus, 1995–2019
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2019, contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus stood at 45.9.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 22.6% on the previous year and down 11.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus peaked at 59.27 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 42.1, in 1995.
Belarus ranks 59th of 113 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 42.1 | — |
| 2005 | 57.04 | +35.5% |
| 2012 | 51.93 | -8.9% |
| 2017 | 59.27 | +14.1% |
| 2019 | 45.9 | -22.6% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 45.9 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50.09, 92% of the median. (31 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 45.9 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 52.39, 88% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.1 | 42.1 | 42.1 | 1 |
| 2000s | 57.04 | 57.04 | 57.04 | 1 |
| 2010s | 52.37 | 45.9 | 59.27 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus?
- Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods in Belarus was 45.9 in 2019, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 59.27 in 2017.
- What is the lowest contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 42.1 in 1995.
- How does Belarus rank for contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods?
- Belarus ranks 59th out of 113 countries with data for 2019.
- Is contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Contraceptive prevalence any methods vs modern methods. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).