Constraints on the Executive Score in Finland
Finland: Constraints on the Executive Score was 7 in 2018. ▬ Flat
Constraints on the Executive Score in Finland, 1917–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, constraints on the executive score in Finland stood at 7. That is the highest value across all 101 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, constraints on the executive score in Finland peaked at 7 in 1917 and was at its lowest, 7, in 1917.
Finland ranks 1st of 166 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| 1920s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1930s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| 1940s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1950s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1960s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1970s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1980s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 1990s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2000s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| 2010s | 7 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 1 Albania 7 compare
- 1 Argentina 7 compare
- 1 Australia 7 compare
- 1 Austria 7 compare
- 1 Belgium 7 compare
- 1 Botswana 7 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 7 compare
- 1 Canada 7 compare
- 1 Cape Verde 7 compare
- 1 Central African Republic 7 compare
- 1 Chile 7 compare
- 1 Costa Rica 7 compare
- 1 Croatia 7 compare
- 1 Cyprus 7 compare
- 1 Czechia 7 compare
- 1 Denmark 7 compare
- 1 East Timor 7 compare
- 1 Estonia 7 compare
- 1 France 7 compare
- 1 Germany 7 compare
- 1 Greece 7 compare
- 1 Guatemala 7 compare
- 1 Hungary 7 compare
- 1 India 7 compare
- 1 Indonesia 7 compare
- 1 Israel 7 compare
- 1 Italy 7 compare
- 1 Jamaica 7 compare
- 1 Japan 7 compare
- 1 Kenya 7 compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 7 compare
- 1 Latvia 7 compare
- 1 Lesotho 7 compare
- 1 Lithuania 7 compare
- 1 Mauritius 7 compare
- 1 Moldova 7 compare
- 1 Mongolia 7 compare
- 1 Montenegro 7 compare
- 1 Myanmar 7 compare
- 1 Netherlands 7 compare
- 1 New Zealand 7 compare
- 1 North Macedonia 7 compare
- 1 Norway 7 compare
- 1 Paraguay 7 compare
- 1 Peru 7 compare
- 1 Poland 7 compare
- 1 Portugal 7 compare
- 1 Romania 7 compare
- 1 Serbia 7 compare
- 1 Slovakia 7 compare
- 1 Slovenia 7 compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 7 compare
- 1 South Africa 7 compare
- 1 Spain 7 compare
- 1 Sweden 7 compare
- 1 Switzerland 7 compare
- 1 Taiwan 7 compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 7 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 7 compare
- 1 Uruguay 7 compare
More reference data data for Finland
- Spring temperature anomalies 5.45 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.52 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -5.24 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 2.9 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.51 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 133.54 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is constraints on the executive score in Finland?
- Constraints on the executive score in Finland was 7 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest constraints on the executive score recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 7 in 1917.
- What is the lowest constraints on the executive score recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 7 in 1917.
- How does Finland rank for constraints on the executive score?
- Finland ranks 1st out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
- Is constraints on the executive score rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Constraints on the Executive Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 101 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which the executive is constrained. It ranges from unconstrained executives (score of 1), over slight or moderate constraints (score of 3), and substantial constraints (score of 5), to an executive that is subordinated to or on par with other authorities (score of 7). The remaining categories are intermediate ones.