Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania
Tanzania: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.8088 index in 2018. â Volatile
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania, 1998â2018
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2018, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania stood at 0.8088 index. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 595.7% on the previous year and up 621.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania peaked at 0.8088 index in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.0103 index, in 2002.
Tanzania ranks 37th of 163 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0725 index | 0.0573 index | 0.0876 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.113 index | 0.0103 index | 0.4139 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2866 index | 0.1098 index | 0.8088 index | 9 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Tanzania was 0.8088 index in 2018, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 0.8088 index in 2018.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0103 index in 2002.
- How does Tanzania rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Tanzania ranks 37th out of 163 countries with data for 2018.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 621.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.