Comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa
South Africa: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.742 index in 2019. âź Falling
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa, 2000â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa stood at 0.742 index. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.
The figure is down 3.4% on the previous year and down 40.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa peaked at 1.73 index in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.742 index, in 2019.
South Africa ranks 41st of 163 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.51 index | 1.26 index | 1.73 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9529 index | 0.742 index | 1.19 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near South Africa
More reference data data for South Africa
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7468 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.49 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 41.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 63.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.07 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in South Africa was 0.742 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in South Africa?
- The highest recorded value was 1.73 index in 2007.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in South Africa?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.742 index in 2019.
- How does South Africa rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- South Africa ranks 41st out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in South Africa?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this South Africa data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.