Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Nepal
Nepal: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.2211 index in 2017. â Volatile
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Nepal, 1998â2017
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
Nepal recorded 0.2211 index for comparative advantage in environmental goods in 2017.
That represents a change of up 75.7% on the previous year and up 536.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Nepal peaked at 0.3459 index in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.0274 index, in 2000.
That places Nepal 94th out of 163 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0579 index | 0.0465 index | 0.0692 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.136 index | 0.0274 index | 0.3459 index | 3 |
| 2010s | 0.1752 index | 0.0663 index | 0.2587 index | 8 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
More reference data data for Nepal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7853 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7753 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 18.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,990 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 211.32 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 688.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.33 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Nepal?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Nepal was 0.2211 index in 2017, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3459 index in 2003.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0274 index in 2000.
- How does Nepal rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Nepal ranks 94th out of 163 countries with data for 2017.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 536.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.