Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Namibia
Namibia: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.1904 index in 2019. ⲠRising
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Namibia, 2000â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
Namibia recorded 0.1904 index for comparative advantage in environmental goods in 2019.
That represents a change of up 7.2% on the previous year and up 46.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Namibia peaked at 0.2291 index in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0707 index, in 2006.
Namibia ranks 99th of 163 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1245 index | 0.0707 index | 0.1959 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.1513 index | 0.0966 index | 0.2291 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Namibia
More reference data data for Namibia
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 22.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,807 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 51.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 34.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,667 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.6803 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 120.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 4.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.194 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Namibia?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Namibia was 0.1904 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Namibia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2291 index in 2013.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Namibia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0707 index in 2006.
- How does Namibia rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Namibia ranks 99th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Namibia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 46.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Namibia data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.