Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan
Japan: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 1.79 index in 2019. ⲠRising
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan, 1998â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan stood at 1.79 index. That is the highest value across all 22 years on record.
The figure is up 16.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan peaked at 1.79 index in 2019 and was at its lowest, 1.24 index, in 1998.
That places Japan 6th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.28 index | 1.24 index | 1.32 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 1.56 index | 1.48 index | 1.68 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.66 index | 1.48 index | 1.79 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Japan
More reference data data for Japan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 15,608 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 259.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 2.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 1,291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 57.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 7,256 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.98 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan was 1.79 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 1.79 index in 2019.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.24 index in 1998.
- How does Japan rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Japan ranks 6th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 16.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.