Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan

Japan: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 1.79 index in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
1.79 index
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
6th
of 163 countries
All-time high
1.79 index
in 2019
All-time low
1.24 index
in 1998
Years of data
22
1998–2019

Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan, 1998–2019

00.511.521998200820191998: 1.2 index1999: 1.3 index2000: 1.5 index2001: 1.5 index2002: 1.5 index2003: 1.6 index2004: 1.7 index2005: 1.7 index2006: 1.7 index2007: 1.5 index2008: 1.5 index2009: 1.5 index2010: 1.6 index2011: 1.7 index2012: 1.7 index2013: 1.7 index2014: 1.6 index2015: 1.5 index2016: 1.5 index2017: 1.8 index2018: 1.8 index2019: 1.8 index

Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.

Analysis

In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan stood at 1.79 index. That is the highest value across all 22 years on record.

The figure is up 16.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan peaked at 1.79 index in 2019 and was at its lowest, 1.24 index, in 1998.

That places Japan 6th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 22 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 1.28 index 1.24 index 1.32 index 2
2000s 1.56 index 1.48 index 1.68 index 10
2010s 1.66 index 1.48 index 1.79 index 10

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 3 Fiji 2.43 index compare
  2. 4 Togo 1.94 index compare
  3. 5 Germany 1.83 index compare
  4. 7 Slovakia 1.54 index compare
  5. 8 Hungary 1.49 index compare
  6. 9 Israel 1.42 index compare

See the full ranking of 163 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan?
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Japan was 1.79 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 1.79 index in 2019.
What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 1.24 index in 1998.
How does Japan rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
Japan ranks 6th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index)
Unit
index
Source
IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
163 places, 3,076 data points, 1998–2019
Last refreshed

Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protection—such as goods related to pollution management and resource management—and adapted goods—which are goods that have been specifically modified to be more “environmentally friendly” or “cleaner.” Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protection—such as goods related to pollution management and resource management—and adapted goods—which are goods that have been specifically modified to be more “environmentally friendly” or “cleaner.” A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.