Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt
Egypt: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.5056 index in 2019. ⲠRising
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt, 1998â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt stood at 0.5056 index.
The figure is down 34.8% on the previous year and up 75.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt peaked at 0.7754 index in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0.1373 index, in 1999.
That places Egypt 53rd out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1529 index | 0.1373 index | 0.1684 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.2727 index | 0.2565 index | 0.2888 index | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.6343 index | 0.4408 index | 0.7754 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
More reference data data for Egypt
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Egypt was 0.5056 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 0.7754 index in 2018.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1373 index in 1999.
- How does Egypt rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Egypt ranks 53rd out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.