Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana
Botswana: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.0232 index in 2019. âź Falling
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana, 2000â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
In 2019, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana stood at 0.0232 index. That is the lowest value across all 20 years on record.
The figure is down 26.7% on the previous year and down 60.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana peaked at 0.0756 index in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0232 index, in 2019.
Botswana ranks 150th of 163 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 20 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0422 index | 0.0243 index | 0.0588 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0397 index | 0.0232 index | 0.0756 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 21.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,922 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 41.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 11.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,899 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 1,846 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Botswana was 0.0232 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0756 index in 2010.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0232 index in 2019.
- How does Botswana rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Botswana ranks 150th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 60.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 20 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.