Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Bhutan
Bhutan: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.2415 index in 2012. ⲠRising
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Bhutan, 1998â2012
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
Bhutan recorded 0.2415 index for comparative advantage in environmental goods in 2012.
That represents a change of down 30.6% on the previous year and up 191.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Bhutan peaked at 0.3478 index in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0828 index, in 1999.
That places Bhutan 87th out of 163 countries with data for 2012, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 10 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1147 index | 0.0828 index | 0.1467 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.141 index | 0.1088 index | 0.1646 index | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.3007 index | 0.2415 index | 0.3478 index | 3 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 155.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 4.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 92.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 4.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 19.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 19.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5687 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 92.47 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Bhutan?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Bhutan was 0.2415 index in 2012, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3478 index in 2011.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0828 index in 1999.
- How does Bhutan rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Bhutan ranks 87th out of 163 countries with data for 2012.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 191.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.