Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Belarus
Belarus: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.3972 index in 2019. â Volatile
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Belarus, 1998â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0.3972 index for comparative advantage in environmental goods in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Belarus peaked at 1.87 index in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.3574 index, in 2011.
That places Belarus 66th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.522 index | 0.4941 index | 0.5499 index | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.4896 index | 0.367 index | 0.5899 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5674 index | 0.3574 index | 1.87 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,429 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 47.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0133 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 21.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 5,669 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 518.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 487.54 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Belarus?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Belarus was 0.3972 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 1.87 index in 2012.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3574 index in 2011.
- How does Belarus rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Belarus ranks 66th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 22 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.