Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia
Armenia: Comparative advantage in environmental goods was 0.1481 index in 2019. ⏠Flat
Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia, 1999â2019
Source: IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations. Measured in index.
Analysis
The most recent figure for comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia is 0.1481 index, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.7% on the previous year and down 42.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia peaked at 0.39 index in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1336 index, in 2002.
That places Armenia 104th out of 163 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2731 index | 0.2731 index | 0.2731 index | 1 |
| 2000s | 0.2307 index | 0.1336 index | 0.39 index | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2182 index | 0.1481 index | 0.3218 index | 10 |
Countries ranked near Armenia
More reference data data for Armenia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0385 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3778 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7338 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.7338 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.129 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1012 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1265 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia?
- Comparative advantage in environmental goods in Armenia was 0.1481 index in 2019, according to IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations.
- What is the highest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Armenia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.39 index in 2008.
- What is the lowest comparative advantage in environmental goods recorded in Armenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1336 index in 2002.
- How does Armenia rank for comparative advantage in environmental goods?
- Armenia ranks 104th out of 163 countries with data for 2019.
- Is comparative advantage in environmental goods rising or falling in Armenia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 42.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Armenia data come from?
- The figures come from IMF Climate Change Dashboard. Data sources: UN Comtrade, DESA/UNSD; IMF staff calculations, published as part of Comparative advantage in environmental goods (index). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV ¡ JSON â 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â Comparative advantage is a measure of the relative advantage or disadvantage a particular country has in a certain class of goods (in this case, environmental goods), and can be used to evaluate export potential in that class of goods. Environmental goods include both goods connected to environmental protectionâsuch as goods related to pollution management and resource managementâand adapted goodsâwhich are goods that have been specifically modified to be more âenvironmentally friendlyâ or âcleaner.â A value greater than one indicates a relative advantage in environmental goods, while a value of less than one indicates a relative disadvantage.