Common Good Justifications Score in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Common Good Justifications Score was 0.836 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.836
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
84th
of 175 countries
All-time high
2.22
in 1989
All-time low
-0.346
in 1990
Years of data
126
1900–2025
Common Good Justifications Score in Kazakhstan, 1900–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 0.836 for common good justifications score in 2025.
That represents a change of up 927.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, common good justifications score in Kazakhstan peaked at 2.22 in 1989 and was at its lowest, -0.346, in 1990.
Kazakhstan ranks 84th of 175 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Common Good Justifications Score in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 0.052 | — |
| 1901 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.101 | +94.2% |
| 1918 | 0.015 | -85.1% |
| 1919 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.015 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.292 | +1846.7% |
| 1924 | 0.659 | +125.7% |
| 1925 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.555 | -15.8% |
| 1931 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.555 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.686 | +23.6% |
| 1938 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.686 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.836 | +21.9% |
| 1942 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.854 | +2.2% |
| 1955 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.854 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1.45 | +69.4% |
| 1986 | 1.55 | +7.3% |
| 1987 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 1.55 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.22 | +42.8% |
| 1990 | -0.346 | -115.6% |
| 1991 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.346 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.101 | -70.8% |
| 2011 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.101 | -0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.445 | -540.6% |
| 2020 | 0.445 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.445 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.498 | +11.9% |
| 2023 | 0.596 | +19.7% |
| 2024 | 0.836 | +40.3% |
| 2025 | 0.836 | +0.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.836 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.639, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.836 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.19, 70% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0.052 | 0.052 | 0.052 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.0495 | 0.015 | 0.101 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.4291 | 0.015 | 0.659 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.5943 | 0.555 | 0.686 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.821 | 0.686 | 0.836 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.8468 | 0.836 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.26 | 0.854 | 2.22 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.346 | -0.346 | -0.346 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.346 | -0.346 | -0.346 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.0464 | -0.101 | 0.445 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6093 | 0.445 | 0.836 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More reference data data for Kazakhstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8607 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 4.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is common good justifications score in Kazakhstan?
- Common good justifications score in Kazakhstan was 0.836 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest common good justifications score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 2.22 in 1989.
- What is the lowest common good justifications score recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.346 in 1990.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for common good justifications score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 84th out of 175 countries with data for 2025.
- Is common good justifications score rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 927.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 126 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.