Common Good Justifications Score in China

China: Common Good Justifications Score was 0.325 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
0.325
Change on year
down 29.8%
World rank
118th
of 175 countries
All-time high
2.61
in 2007
All-time low
0.325
in 2025
Years of data
126
1900–2025

Common Good Justifications Score in China, 1900–2025

0.511.522.5190019622025

Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

The most recent figure for common good justifications score in China is 0.325, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 126 years on record.

The figure is down 29.8% on the previous year and down 85.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, common good justifications score in China peaked at 2.61 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.325, in 2025.

That places China 118th out of 175 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 126 years of available data.

Common Good Justifications Score in China, year by year

Annual values for Common Good Justifications Score in China, 1900 to 2025.
Year Value Change
1900 0.587 —
1901 0.587 +0.0%
1902 0.587 +0.0%
1903 0.587 +0.0%
1904 0.587 +0.0%
1905 0.587 +0.0%
1906 0.587 +0.0%
1907 0.587 +0.0%
1908 0.587 +0.0%
1909 0.587 +0.0%
1910 0.587 +0.0%
1911 0.607 +3.4%
1912 0.989 +62.9%
1913 0.989 +0.0%
1914 0.989 +0.0%
1915 0.989 +0.0%
1916 0.989 +0.0%
1917 0.989 +0.0%
1918 0.989 +0.0%
1919 0.989 +0.0%
1920 0.989 +0.0%
1921 0.989 +0.0%
1922 1.03 +4.3%
1923 1.03 +0.0%
1924 1.03 +0.0%
1925 1.03 +0.0%
1926 1.03 +0.0%
1927 1.03 +0.0%
1928 0.851 -17.5%
1929 0.851 +0.0%
1930 0.851 +0.0%
1931 0.851 +0.0%
1932 0.851 +0.0%
1933 0.851 +0.0%
1934 0.851 +0.0%
1935 0.851 +0.0%
1936 0.851 +0.0%
1937 0.851 +0.0%
1938 0.892 +4.8%
1939 0.892 +0.0%
1940 0.892 +0.0%
1941 0.892 +0.0%
1942 0.892 +0.0%
1943 0.892 +0.0%
1944 0.892 +0.0%
1945 0.892 +0.0%
1946 0.85 -4.7%
1947 0.85 +0.0%
1948 0.85 +0.0%
1949 0.9 +5.9%
1950 1.14 +26.6%
1951 1.14 +0.0%
1952 1.14 +0.0%
1953 1.14 +0.0%
1954 1.14 +0.0%
1955 1.14 +0.0%
1956 1.14 +0.0%
1957 1.12 -2.0%
1958 1 -10.0%
1959 1 +0.0%
1960 1 +0.0%
1961 1 +0.0%
1962 1 +0.0%
1963 1 +0.0%
1964 1 +0.0%
1965 1 +0.0%
1966 0.948 -5.6%
1967 0.948 +0.0%
1968 0.948 +0.0%
1969 0.948 +0.0%
1970 0.948 +0.0%
1971 0.948 +0.0%
1972 0.948 +0.0%
1973 0.948 +0.0%
1974 0.948 +0.0%
1975 0.948 +0.0%
1976 0.948 +0.0%
1977 1.01 +6.2%
1978 1.23 +21.8%
1979 1.28 +4.4%
1980 1.92 +49.9%
1981 1.92 +0.0%
1982 1.92 +0.0%
1983 1.92 +0.0%
1984 1.92 +0.0%
1985 1.92 +0.0%
1986 1.92 +0.0%
1987 1.92 +0.0%
1988 1.73 -9.9%
1989 1.73 +0.0%
1990 1.73 +0.0%
1991 1.8 +4.3%
1992 1.8 +0.0%
1993 1.8 +0.0%
1994 1.8 +0.0%
1995 1.8 +0.0%
1996 1.8 +0.0%
1997 1.8 +0.0%
1998 1.8 +0.0%
1999 1.8 +0.0%
2000 1.8 +0.0%
2001 2.13 +17.8%
2002 2.13 +0.0%
2003 2.57 +20.7%
2004 2.57 +0.0%
2005 2.5 -2.6%
2006 2.54 +1.6%
2007 2.61 +3.0%
2008 2.54 -3.0%
2009 2.6 +2.5%
2010 2.45 -5.8%
2011 2.45 +0.0%
2012 2.38 -2.9%
2013 2.12 -10.7%
2014 2.24 +5.5%
2015 2.24 +0.0%
2016 2.24 +0.0%
2017 1.2 -46.6%
2018 1.2 +0.0%
2019 1.2 +0.0%
2020 0.949 -20.7%
2021 0.949 +0.0%
2022 0.503 -47.0%
2023 0.503 +0.0%
2024 0.463 -8.0%
2025 0.325 -29.8%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 0.325 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.639, 51% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
  • China's 0.325 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.024, 13.5× the median. (22 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1900s 0.587 0.587 0.587 10
1910s 0.9106 0.587 0.989 10
1920s 0.9872 0.851 1.03 10
1930s 0.8592 0.851 0.892 10
1940s 0.8802 0.85 0.9 10
1950s 1.11 1 1.14 10
1960s 0.9816 0.948 1 10
1970s 1.02 0.948 1.28 10
1980s 1.88 1.73 1.92 10
1990s 1.8 1.73 1.8 10
2000s 2.4 1.8 2.61 10
2010s 1.97 1.2 2.45 10
2020s 0.6153 0.325 0.949 6

Countries ranked near China

  1. 115 Philippines 0.363 compare
  2. 116 Tanzania 0.35 compare
  3. 117 Pakistan 0.33 compare
  4. 119 Kyrgyzstan 0.29 compare
  5. 120 Guinea-Bissau 0.281 compare
  6. 121 Romania 0.28 compare

See the full ranking of 175 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is common good justifications score in China?
Common good justifications score in China was 0.325 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest common good justifications score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 2.61 in 2007.
What is the lowest common good justifications score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 0.325 in 2025.
How does China rank for common good justifications score?
China ranks 118th out of 175 countries with data for 2025.
Is common good justifications score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is down 85.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Common Good Justifications Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 126 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Common Good Justifications Score in China. Statizoid, drawing on V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/common-good-justifications-score/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/common-good-justifications-score/china/">Common Good Justifications Score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Common Good Justifications Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
175 places, 20,802 data points, 1900–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which political elites justify their views with the common good for society, either the greatest good for the greatest number of people or as helping the least advantaged people in society when considering important policy changes.