Combined polity score in Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone: Combined polity score was 7 in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
7
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
9th
of 51 countries
All-time high
7
in 2007
All-time low
-88
in 2001
Years of data
51
1961–2011

Combined polity score in Sierra Leone, 1961–2011

-80-60-40-200196119862011

Source: Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.

Analysis

The most recent figure for combined polity score in Sierra Leone is 7, measured in 2011. That is the highest value across all 51 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 108.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, combined polity score in Sierra Leone peaked at 7 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -88, in 2001.

That places Sierra Leone 9th out of 51 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 3.44 -7 6 9
1970s -5.5 -7 1 10
1980s -7 -7 -7 10
1990s -26.8 -77 4 10
2000s -11.9 -88 7 10
2010s 7 7 7 2

Countries ranked near Sierra Leone

  1. 9 Benin 7 compare
  2. 9 Mali 7 compare
  3. 9 Senegal 7 compare
  4. 9 Zambia 7 compare

See the full ranking of 51 places →

More reference data data for Sierra Leone

All data for Sierra Leone →

Frequently asked questions

What is combined polity score in Sierra Leone?
Combined polity score in Sierra Leone was 7 in 2011, according to Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
What is the highest combined polity score recorded in Sierra Leone?
The highest recorded value was 7 in 2007.
What is the lowest combined polity score recorded in Sierra Leone?
The lowest recorded value was -88 in 2001.
How does Sierra Leone rank for combined polity score?
Sierra Leone ranks 9th out of 51 countries with data for 2011.
Is combined polity score rising or falling in Sierra Leone?
Over the last ten years it is up 108.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?
The figures come from Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as part of Combined polity score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Combined polity score
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

The Combined Polity score is computed by subtracting the AUTOCRACY score (UPP.INS.AUTO.XQ) from the DEMOCRACY score (UPP.INS.DEMO.XQ); the resulting unified polity scale ranges from +10 (strongly democratic) to -10 (strongly autocratic). Note: The POLITY score was added to the Polity IV data series in recognition of its common usage by users in quantitative research and in the overriding interest of maintaining uniformity among users in this application. The simple combination of the original DEMOC and AUTOC index values in a unitary POLITY scale, in many ways, runs contrary to the original theory stated by Eckstein and Gurr in Patterns of Authority Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual 17 (1975) and, so, should be treated and interpreted with due caution. Its primary utility is in investigative research which should be augmented by more detailed analysis. The original theory posits that autocratic and democratic authority are distinct patterns of authority, elements of which may co-exist in any particular regime context. The inclusion of this variable in the data series should not be seen as an acceptance of the counter-proposal that autocracy and democracy are alternatives or opposites in a unified authority spectrum, even though elements of this perspective may be implied in the original theory. The POLITY variable provides a convenient avenue for examining general regime effects in analyses but researchers should note that the middle of the implied POLITY “spectrum” is somewhat muddled in terms of the original theory, masking various combinations of DEMOC and AUTOC scores with the same POLITY score. Investigations involving hypotheses of varying effects of democracy and/or autocracy should employ the original Polity scheme and test DEMOC and AUTOC separately.