Combined polity score in Democratic Republic of Congo

Democratic Republic of Congo: Combined polity score was 5 in 2011. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2011)
5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
20th
of 51 countries
All-time high
5
in 2006
All-time low
-88
in 1963
Years of data
52
1960–2011

Combined polity score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1960–2011

-80-60-40-200196019852011

Source: Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.

Analysis

Democratic Republic of Congo recorded 5 for combined polity score in 2011. That is the highest value across all 52 years on record.

That represents a change of up 106.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, combined polity score in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, -88, in 1963.

That places Democratic Republic of Congo 20th out of 51 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s -45.2 -88 -9 10
1970s -9 -9 -9 10
1980s -9 -9 -9 10
1990s -63.2 -77 -8 10
2000s -47.5 -88 5 10
2010s 5 5 5 2

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. 20 Guinea 5 compare
  2. 20 Mozambique 5 compare
  3. 23 Cote d'Ivoire 4 compare
  4. 23 Nigeria 4 compare

See the full ranking of 51 places →

More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is combined polity score in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Combined polity score in Democratic Republic of Congo was 5 in 2011, according to Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm.
What is the highest combined polity score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The highest recorded value was 5 in 2006.
What is the lowest combined polity score recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The lowest recorded value was -88 in 1963.
How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for combined polity score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 20th out of 51 countries with data for 2011.
Is combined polity score rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Over the last ten years it is up 106.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
The figures come from Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as part of Combined polity score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Combined polity score
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

The Combined Polity score is computed by subtracting the AUTOCRACY score (UPP.INS.AUTO.XQ) from the DEMOCRACY score (UPP.INS.DEMO.XQ); the resulting unified polity scale ranges from +10 (strongly democratic) to -10 (strongly autocratic). Note: The POLITY score was added to the Polity IV data series in recognition of its common usage by users in quantitative research and in the overriding interest of maintaining uniformity among users in this application. The simple combination of the original DEMOC and AUTOC index values in a unitary POLITY scale, in many ways, runs contrary to the original theory stated by Eckstein and Gurr in Patterns of Authority Polity IV Project: Dataset Users’ Manual 17 (1975) and, so, should be treated and interpreted with due caution. Its primary utility is in investigative research which should be augmented by more detailed analysis. The original theory posits that autocratic and democratic authority are distinct patterns of authority, elements of which may co-exist in any particular regime context. The inclusion of this variable in the data series should not be seen as an acceptance of the counter-proposal that autocracy and democracy are alternatives or opposites in a unified authority spectrum, even though elements of this perspective may be implied in the original theory. The POLITY variable provides a convenient avenue for examining general regime effects in analyses but researchers should note that the middle of the implied POLITY “spectrum” is somewhat muddled in terms of the original theory, masking various combinations of DEMOC and AUTOC scores with the same POLITY score. Investigations involving hypotheses of varying effects of democracy and/or autocracy should employ the original Polity scheme and test DEMOC and AUTOC separately.