Clientelism Index in Denmark
Denmark: Clientelism Index was 0.034 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Clientelism Index in Denmark, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Denmark stood at 0.034.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Denmark peaked at 0.237 in 1835 and was at its lowest, 0.022, in 2005.
That places Denmark 174th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Clientelism Index in Denmark, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.085 | — |
| 1790 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.237 | +178.8% |
| 1836 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.237 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.045 | -81.0% |
| 1849 | 0.048 | +6.7% |
| 1850 | 0.05 | +4.2% |
| 1851 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.049 | -2.0% |
| 1853 | 0.047 | -4.1% |
| 1854 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.045 | -4.3% |
| 1856 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.048 | +6.7% |
| 1859 | 0.05 | +4.2% |
| 1860 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.051 | +2.0% |
| 1862 | 0.052 | +2.0% |
| 1863 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.05 | -3.8% |
| 1865 | 0.048 | -4.0% |
| 1866 | 0.047 | -2.1% |
| 1867 | 0.046 | -2.1% |
| 1868 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.047 | +2.2% |
| 1870 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.046 | -2.1% |
| 1874 | 0.042 | -8.7% |
| 1875 | 0.042 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.047 | +11.9% |
| 1877 | 0.05 | +6.4% |
| 1878 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.045 | -10.0% |
| 1880 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.046 | +2.2% |
| 1882 | 0.047 | +2.2% |
| 1883 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.046 | -2.1% |
| 1885 | 0.045 | -2.2% |
| 1886 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.048 | +6.7% |
| 1888 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.047 | -2.1% |
| 1891 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.048 | +2.1% |
| 1893 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.046 | -4.2% |
| 1896 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.046 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.049 | +6.5% |
| 1899 | 0.05 | +2.0% |
| 1900 | 0.05 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.04 | -20.0% |
| 1902 | 0.037 | -7.5% |
| 1903 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.038 | +2.7% |
| 1905 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.037 | -2.6% |
| 1910 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.038 | +2.7% |
| 1914 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.039 | +2.6% |
| 1916 | 0.04 | +2.6% |
| 1917 | 0.04 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.036 | -10.0% |
| 1919 | 0.034 | -5.6% |
| 1920 | 0.036 | +5.9% |
| 1921 | 0.037 | +2.8% |
| 1922 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.036 | -2.7% |
| 1925 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.037 | +2.8% |
| 1928 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.038 | +2.7% |
| 1931 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.037 | -2.6% |
| 1933 | 0.035 | -5.4% |
| 1934 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.037 | +5.7% |
| 1937 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.039 | +5.4% |
| 1940 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.051 | +30.8% |
| 1944 | 0.052 | +2.0% |
| 1945 | 0.052 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.035 | -32.7% |
| 1947 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.036 | +2.9% |
| 1949 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.034 | -5.6% |
| 1952 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.037 | +8.8% |
| 1954 | 0.038 | +2.7% |
| 1955 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.036 | -5.3% |
| 1958 | 0.034 | -5.6% |
| 1959 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.035 | +2.9% |
| 1962 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.035 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.034 | -2.9% |
| 1965 | 0.033 | -2.9% |
| 1966 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.039 | +18.2% |
| 1968 | 0.037 | -5.1% |
| 1969 | 0.037 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.025 | -32.4% |
| 1971 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.026 | +4.0% |
| 1975 | 0.024 | -7.7% |
| 1976 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.026 | +8.3% |
| 1978 | 0.027 | +3.8% |
| 1979 | 0.026 | -3.7% |
| 1980 | 0.025 | -3.8% |
| 1981 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.024 | -4.0% |
| 1983 | 0.024 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.025 | +4.2% |
| 1985 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.024 | -4.0% |
| 1988 | 0.023 | -4.2% |
| 1989 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.023 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.026 | +13.0% |
| 1992 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.025 | -3.8% |
| 1996 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.026 | +4.0% |
| 1999 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.026 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.025 | -3.8% |
| 2003 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.025 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.022 | -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.022 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.036 | +63.6% |
| 2014 | 0.036 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.035 | -2.8% |
| 2016 | 0.034 | -2.9% |
| 2017 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.036 | +5.9% |
| 2020 | 0.038 | +5.6% |
| 2021 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.037 | -2.6% |
| 2023 | 0.034 | -8.1% |
| 2024 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
Denmark compared with similar countries
- Denmark's 0.034 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 26% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Denmark's 0.034 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.182, 19% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.085 | 0.085 | 0.085 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.161 | 0.085 | 0.237 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.1989 | 0.045 | 0.237 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.0476 | 0.045 | 0.05 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.0489 | 0.046 | 0.052 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.0463 | 0.042 | 0.05 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.0465 | 0.045 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.0475 | 0.046 | 0.05 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.0391 | 0.037 | 0.05 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.0376 | 0.034 | 0.04 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.0366 | 0.036 | 0.037 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.0368 | 0.035 | 0.039 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.0414 | 0.035 | 0.052 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0359 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0352 | 0.033 | 0.039 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0253 | 0.024 | 0.027 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0243 | 0.023 | 0.025 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0254 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0237 | 0.022 | 0.026 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0311 | 0.022 | 0.036 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0358 | 0.034 | 0.038 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Denmark
- 172 Luxembourg 0.044 compare
- 173 Germany 0.038 compare
- 175 Norway 0.029 compare
- 176 Netherlands 0.028 compare
More reference data data for Denmark
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1915 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4109 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Denmark?
- Clientelism index in Denmark was 0.034 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Denmark?
- The highest recorded value was 0.237 in 1835.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Denmark?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.022 in 2005.
- How does Denmark rank for clientelism index?
- Denmark ranks 174th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Denmark?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Denmark data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.