Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 42.5% in 2021. ▲ Rising

Latest (2021)
42.5%
Change on year
down 1.4%
World rank
18th
of 31 countries
All-time high
43.1%
in 2020
All-time low
33.2%
in 2007
Years of data
9
2007–2021

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan, 2007–2021

0102030402007201420212007: 33.22010: 33.42014: 42.62015: 37.92017: 40.32018: 42.62019: 41.52020: 43.12021: 42.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2021, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan stood at 42.5%.

That represents a change of down 1.4% on the previous year and up 27.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan peaked at 43.1% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 33.2%, in 2007.

Kazakhstan ranks 18th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Kazakhstan, 2007 to 2021.
Year Value Change
2007 33.2%
2010 33.4% +0.8%
2014 42.6% +27.3%
2015 37.9% -11.0%
2017 40.3% +6.3%
2018 42.6% +5.8%
2019 41.5% -2.5%
2020 43.1% +3.7%
2021 42.5% -1.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 1
2010s 39.7% 33.4% 42.6% 6
2020s 42.8% 42.5% 43.1% 2

Countries ranked near Kazakhstan

  1. 15 El Salvador 47.7% compare
  2. 16 Vietnam 47.4% compare
  3. 17 Turkey 44.6% compare
  4. 19 Mongolia 37.6% compare
  5. 20 Uruguay 36.3% compare
  6. 21 Kyrgyzstan 30.9% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Kazakhstan

All data for Kazakhstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan?
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Kazakhstan was 42.5% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Kazakhstan?
The highest recorded value was 43.1% in 2020.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Kazakhstan?
The lowest recorded value was 33.2% in 2007.
How does Kazakhstan rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Kazakhstan ranks 18th out of 31 countries with data for 2021.
Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
Over the last ten years it is up 27.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/kazakhstan/">Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Kazakhstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population