Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus

Belarus: Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory was 27.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
27.8%
Change on year
up 3.7%
World rank
26th
of 31 countries
All-time high
30.4%
in 2017
All-time low
24.3%
in 2009
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, 2008–2019

01020302008201320192008: 26.82009: 24.32010: 24.62012: 25.22013: 25.12014: 26.12015: 26.92016: 28.12017: 30.42018: 26.82019: 27.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus stood at 27.8%.

The figure is up 3.7% on the previous year and up 14.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus peaked at 30.4% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 24.3%, in 2009.

Belarus ranks 26th of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 26.8%
2009 24.3% -9.5%
2010 24.6% +1.3%
2012 25.2% +2.6%
2013 25.1% -0.7%
2014 26.1% +4.1%
2015 26.9% +3.0%
2016 28.1% +4.7%
2017 30.4% +8.0%
2018 26.8% -11.6%
2019 27.8% +3.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 25.5% 24.3% 26.8% 2
2010s 26.8% 24.6% 30.4% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 23 Romania 30.2% compare
  2. 24 Chile 29.2% compare
  3. 25 Armenia 28.3% compare
  4. 27 Kosovo 24.4% compare
  5. 27 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 24.4% compare
  6. 29 Ukraine 23.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus?
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory in Belarus was 27.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 30.4% in 2017.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 24.3% in 2009.
How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory?
Belarus ranks 26th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 14.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-contributory-pensions-rural/belarus/">Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 292 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the richestquintile relative to the total benefits going to the population