Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia

Serbia: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural was 20.2% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
20.2%
Change on year
down 30.7%
World rank
23rd
of 35 countries
All-time high
29.2%
in 2021
All-time low
17.1%
in 2013
Years of data
8
2007–2022

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia, 2007–2022

01020302007201420222007: 18.32010: 19.12013: 17.12015: 28.12018: 21.82019: 21.42021: 29.22022: 20.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Serbia recorded 20.2% for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in 2022.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 30.7% on the previous year and up 18.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Serbia peaked at 29.2% in 2021 and was at its lowest, 17.1%, in 2013.

That places Serbia 23rd out of 35 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia, 2007 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2007 18.3%
2010 19.1% +4.5%
2013 17.1% -10.6%
2015 28.1% +64.2%
2018 21.8% -22.3%
2019 21.4% -2.1%
2021 29.2% +36.5%
2022 20.2% -30.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 1
2010s 21.5% 17.1% 28.1% 5
2020s 24.7% 20.2% 29.2% 2

Countries ranked near Serbia

  1. 20 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 20.8% compare
  2. 21 Poland 20.7% compare
  3. 22 Burkina Faso 20.5% compare
  4. 24 Kosovo 20.2% compare
  5. 24 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 20.2% compare
  6. 26 Dominican Republic 20.0% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Serbia?
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural in Serbia was 20.2% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Serbia?
The highest recorded value was 29.2% in 2021.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural recorded in Serbia?
The lowest recorded value was 17.1% in 2013.
How does Serbia rank for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural?
Serbia ranks 23rd out of 35 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - all private transfers -rural rising or falling in Serbia?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Serbia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/serbia/">Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Serbia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population