Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban was 19.5% in 2017. ▲ Rising

Latest (2017)
19.5%
World rank
2nd
of 34 countries
All-time high
20.0%
in 2011
All-time low
15.9%
in 2006
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

051015202006201120172006: 15.92011: 202012: 182013: 18.12017: 19.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 19.5%, measured in 2017.

That represents a change of up 22.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 20.0% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 15.9%, in 2006.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 2nd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 15.9%
2011 20.0% +26.2%
2012 18.0% -10.1%
2013 18.1% +0.8%
2017 19.5% +7.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.9% 15.9% 15.9% 1
2010s 18.9% 18.0% 20.0% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 1 Republic of Moldova 19.8% compare
  2. 2 Kosovo 19.5% compare
  3. 4 Ukraine 19.4% compare
  4. 5 Belarus 19.4% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 19.5% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 20.0% in 2011.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 15.9% in 2006.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2017.
Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - contributory pensions -urban rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is up 22.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-2nd-quintile-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population