Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus

Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory was 12.7% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
12.7%
Change on year
down 7.1%
World rank
7th
of 34 countries
All-time high
14.5%
in 2013
All-time low
10.0%
in 2008
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 102009: 132010: 10.32012: 11.52013: 14.52014: 12.42015: 12.62016: 11.42017: 132018: 13.62019: 12.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus stood at 12.7%.

That represents a change of down 7.1% on the previous year and down 2.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus peaked at 14.5% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 10.0%, in 2008.

Belarus ranks 7th of 34 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 10.0%
2009 13.0% +29.3%
2010 10.3% -20.4%
2012 11.5% +11.9%
2013 14.5% +25.9%
2014 12.4% -14.8%
2015 12.6% +1.8%
2016 11.4% -9.2%
2017 13.0% +14.1%
2018 13.6% +4.5%
2019 12.7% -7.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 11.5% 10.0% 13.0% 2
2010s 12.5% 10.3% 14.5% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 5 Armenia 14.3% compare
  2. 6 Serbia 14.2% compare
  3. 8 Romania 10.8% compare
  4. 9 Kyrgyzstan 10.7% compare
  5. 10 Poland 10.1% compare

See the full ranking of 34 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory in Belarus was 12.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 14.5% in 2013.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 10.0% in 2008.
How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory?
Belarus ranks 7th out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - contributory rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-contributory-pensions-urban/belarus/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Contributory Pensions -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
34 places, 347 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population