Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador

Ecuador: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 9.4% in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
9.4%
Change on year
up 4.3%
World rank
19th
of 36 countries
All-time high
9.7%
in 2016
All-time low
4.3%
in 2008
Years of data
13
2008–2022

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador, 2008–2022

02468102008201520222008: 4.32010: 6.12011: 5.82012: 6.82014: 7.72015: 8.92016: 9.72017: 8.92018: 9.52019: 9.72020: 82021: 92022: 9.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2022, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador stood at 9.4%.

That represents a change of up 4.3% on the previous year and up 37.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador peaked at 9.7% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 4.3%, in 2008.

Ecuador ranks 19th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 13 years of available data.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers in Ecuador, 2008 to 2022.
Year Value Change
2008 4.3%
2010 6.1% +41.3%
2011 5.8% -4.5%
2012 6.8% +17.3%
2014 7.7% +12.3%
2015 8.9% +16.1%
2016 9.7% +9.6%
2017 8.9% -9.2%
2018 9.5% +7.2%
2019 9.7% +2.0%
2020 8.0% -17.7%
2021 9.0% +12.8%
2022 9.4% +4.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 1
2010s 8.1% 5.8% 9.7% 9
2020s 8.8% 8.0% 9.4% 3

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 16 Panama 10.5% compare
  2. 17 Kyrgyzstan 10.1% compare
  3. 18 Brazil 9.5% compare
  4. 20 Bolivia 8.9% compare
  5. 21 El Salvador 8.8% compare
  6. 22 Peru 8.7% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Ecuador was 9.4% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 9.7% in 2016.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 4.3% in 2008.
How does Ecuador rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Ecuador ranks 19th out of 36 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 37.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers/ecuador/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 351 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population