Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus

Belarus: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 13.1% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
13.1%
Change on year
down 3.0%
World rank
10th
of 36 countries
All-time high
14.4%
in 2009
All-time low
11.0%
in 2015
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, 2008–2019

0510152008201320192008: 11.22009: 14.42010: 12.92012: 13.52013: 14.12014: 11.62015: 112016: 132017: 11.12018: 13.52019: 13.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus is 13.1%, measured in 2019.

That represents a change of down 3.0% on the previous year and down 9.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus peaked at 14.4% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 11.0%, in 2015.

Belarus ranks 10th of 36 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 11.2%
2009 14.4% +29.1%
2010 12.9% -10.6%
2012 13.5% +4.6%
2013 14.1% +4.8%
2014 11.6% -18.2%
2015 11.0% -4.6%
2016 13.0% +18.0%
2017 11.1% -14.3%
2018 13.5% +20.8%
2019 13.1% -3.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 12.8% 11.2% 14.4% 2
2010s 12.6% 11.0% 14.1% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 7 Romania 13.9% compare
  2. 8 Panama 13.8% compare
  3. 9 Dominican Republic 13.6% compare
  4. 11 Colombia 12.8% compare
  5. 12 Peru 12.6% compare
  6. 13 Paraguay 11.8% compare

See the full ranking of 36 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Belarus was 13.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 14.4% in 2009.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 11.0% in 2015.
How does Belarus rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Belarus ranks 10th out of 36 countries with data for 2019.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 9.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-urban/belarus/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
36 places, 350 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population