Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova

Republic of Moldova: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private was 9.2% in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
9.2%
Change on year
down 19.1%
World rank
18th
of 35 countries
All-time high
11.3%
in 2017
All-time low
4.2%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova, 2010–2018

02.557.51012.52010201420182010: 4.22012: 82013: 6.62017: 11.32018: 9.2

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2018, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova stood at 9.2%.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 19.1% on the previous year and up 117.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova peaked at 11.3% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 4.2%, in 2010.

That places Republic of Moldova 18th out of 35 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural in Republic of Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 4.2%
2012 8.0% +89.7%
2013 6.6% -16.7%
2017 11.3% +70.3%
2018 9.2% -19.1%

Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova

  1. 15 Colombia 10.2% compare
  2. 16 Poland 9.6% compare
  3. 17 Georgia 9.5% compare
  4. 19 Burkina Faso 8.4% compare
  5. 20 Ecuador 8.3% compare
  6. 21 Kosovo 8.2% compare
  7. 21 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 8.2% compare

See the full ranking of 35 places →

More reference data data for Republic of Moldova

All data for Republic of Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private in Republic of Moldova was 9.2% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 11.3% in 2017.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 4.2% in 2010.
How does Republic of Moldova rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private?
Republic of Moldova ranks 18th out of 35 countries with data for 2018.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all private rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 117.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private in Republic of Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
35 places, 334 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population